The first of two posts today but just a quick feedback based one; you were so helpful with the last. In yesterdays post on ‘Loaded’ by Christos Tsiolkas I did something a little bit different, so little you may not have noticed, when I put the details of the book with the picture of the cover. The publisher, the year it came out originally (reissued date if so needed), amount of pages and how I got it.
I really like it on other blogs like this one and this one, I do love to know how bloggers get to reading what they do, I also like to know how weighty a tome a book might be? Until yesterday I have just never done it myself, and I don’t know if I like it or not! It did make me notice that I don’t include any of this in a review, apart from the source of the book at the bottom normally in grey italics, and unless you look at my tags you never know who the publisher is and that doesn’t seem fair, especially if they sent it.
What do you think? Does it help you as readers of the blog if all that information is there or if I have intrigued you with my thoughts on the book do you then go off and find out more yourself?