Pride and Prejudice and Zombies – Jane Austen and Seth Grahame-Smith

I have to say with poetry and now a graphic novel adaptation of ‘Pride and Prejudice and Zombies’ by Jane Austen and Seth Grahame-Smith (adapted by Tony Lee and illustrated by Cliff Richards) in a single week you might be wondering if Savidge Reads has been taken over by zombies. I can promise you whilst illness has be a forte for me this year it is not ‘the plague’ that has got me. I seem to just want to be trying more varied things and whilst I didn’t want to read the novel that this is based on, and I still haven’t actually read ‘Pride and Prejudice’ (I know, I know), yet when my uncle got this out from the library and I saw it lying around I thought ‘well, why not?’

Titan Books; graphic novel; paperback; 2010; 176 pages; from the library

There is almost no point bringing up the whole storyline of ‘Pride and Prejudice and Zombies’ because I think everyone on earth (I almost seriously think that) knows the story of ‘Pride and Prejudice’ don’t they? Well take that story and imagine the Hertfordshire town of Meryton is in the midst of a zombie flooded England and the Bennett sisters are being trained by their father to become warrior women who can perform the ‘pentagram of death’ at any zombie intruded ball.

Whilst Jane and Elizabeth, who is a ‘student of Shaolin, master of the seven-starred first’, enjoy their roles some of the sisters like flighty Lydia are slightly more worried about getting their dresses dirty with brains and not interesting the soldiers. Mrs Bennett is more bothered about them finding husbands and when Mr Bingley and Mr Darcy arrive in town this sets everyone in quite a stir.

You of course know what’s going to come after these two men ride into town, or do you? What Seth Grahame-Smith, and I am sure to some extent Tony Lee in his adaptation, has done is explain some of the characters actions in different ways. Why does Charlotte Lucas really accept Mr Collins hand? Why is the legendary female warrior Lady Catherine such a great slayer of zombies and such a character? Will there be a happy ever after, and what might happen to everyone else if the best slaying sister Elizabeth leaves for another shire?

I don’t always like a spin off. I almost think there is something a little unoriginal about them, why do authors not want to create something new rather than almost pilfer someone else’s story or idea’s (ironic from the man who wants to write a fictional tale of ‘Mrs Danvers’ life)? However there are times when it can work and be original. I’m thinking of ‘Wide Sargasso Sea’ by Jean Rhys or ‘Wicked’ by Gregory Maguire etc. I think this is one that works because it’s not what you would expect, it’s often quite funny, and at no point do you feel this has been done as some gimmicky piss-take/cashing in at Jane Austen’s expense. I do wish they hadn’t made Elizabeth blonde and Jane a brunette though, it really through me, I kept getting them mixed up.

As I said earlier, almost everyone knows the story of ‘Pride and Prejudice’ and I wonder if that is why I really rather enjoyed ‘Pride and Prejudice and Zombies’ all the more. It gave a story that I feel I know too well (in a nice way, I love the BBC adaptation to bits) and did something different with it, rather like the wonderful TV series ‘Lost In Austen’ only in this instance the storyline doesn’t have an avid reader disturbing it but a host of zombies instead. I’m not sure if the die hard Austen fans will like this or not but its something a bit different. I can’t say it’s made me want to rush and read ‘Sense and Sensibility and Sea Monsters’ but interestingly it has made me want to read some of Austen’s other work.

What are your thoughts on this Austen based twist, is it just a gimmicky cash in or a new and interesting take on her work? Who has read the book? Who is going to see the film, apparently Natalie Portman is producing it?


Filed under Graphic Novels, Jane Austen, Review, Seth Grahame-Smith, Titan Books

12 responses to “Pride and Prejudice and Zombies – Jane Austen and Seth Grahame-Smith

  1. Erika W.

    I’ll draw your attention to “Little Vampire Women” which I enjoyed thoroughly because of its cleverness and the way in which the author knows the original book through and through. I may even reread it one of these days.

  2. Oh, Simon, Simon… I’m afraid I’m going to put on my snobby hat today. I have no problem with people reading this who have already read P&P (although I would never touch this spin-off with a barge pole) but my main worry was that people would read it without having read P&P, and then not bother reading Austen’s book – about 85% of this is straight out of P&P, after all. It makes me really sad that people will come to P&P second, or not at all.

    • Ah now you see Simon (and feel free to put a snobby hat on at any point by the way) I would agree if I had read the print version of this. I think that would be naughty. But a graphic novel doesnt seem to bad at all. Well, I don’t think so. I do think that people need to read the actual book before the print one. I also think it is a good way to find Jane some fans she might have missed maybe.

  3. Louise

    I haven’t read this but I do have a copy of Jane Slayer, The Literary Classic with a Bloodsucking Twist…still unread!

  4. gaskella

    I loved this, but to appreciate it properly, you do have to have read P&P as Simon is right – most of the text is the original. (My review is here BTW). I did feel that the comedy wasn’t quite sustained all the way through, (the appendix made me guffaw though). I dare you to read the original! ;P

  5. I really enjoyed this one. I read it after having read P&P, which I think is why I enjoyed it so much. Definitely a fun book – laughed quite a bit with it. I’ve got a few other Quirk Classic mash-ups that I’m eager to read. I like that they are having fun with the classics – makes me actually want to read the originals. Cheers!

    • I think because this was visual, rather than prose, it worked for me as I have seen P&P so many times already. I agree with what you are saying about these sometimes making you want to read the originals even more. I am just not sure me and P&P are meant to be. I have tried and failed three times now.

  6. I’ve started P, P & Z late last year and couldn’t finish it. It wasn’t bad,but couldn’t help constantly listing all the other books I would like to be reading instead.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s