Tideline – Penny Hancock

They say that there is nothing new to write about under the sun, and they are probably right. So when I hear of any novel where people are claiming that it is ‘a truly original story’ or ‘quite unlike any other book of its genre’ I tend to look on sceptically. In the case of ‘Tideline’ by Penny Hancock I think those are actually two quotes that I would give the book myself. If you love a good thriller, as you probably know I do, and want something that stands out from the crowd in what is the biggest market in books then this is definitely a book you should be giving a whirl.

Simon & Schuster, hardback, 2012, fiction, 352 pages, kindly sent by the publisher

As clichéd as it may sound I was hooked from the very first page of ‘Tideline’ and found it very difficult to put down. In fact I am struggling to think of a thriller or crime novel that has thrown me into its story in such a gripping, and also rather disturbing way so instantly in quite some time. As this psychological thriller starts we are instantly drawn into the story as Sonia, a music teacher living in Greenwich, opens the door to a fifteen year old boy called Jez who she decides she won’t allow to leave… ever.

The speed with which Penny Hancock took me into the story and indeed Sonia’s thoughts was so swift and sudden that I found I had to stop reading and take stock of the situation before I could pick the book up again. This is not one of those books where the author builds up the suspense slowly and leads you on for 100 pages until something actually happens, this is a book that grabs you and simply won’t let you go and I was left pondering if Penny Hancock would keep the momentum at the pace the whole way through, indeed she does.

The speed in which Sonia makes the decision to hold Jez hostage makes us realise that this is no planned event, it also tells us that we have in Sonia a protagonist who is on the edge and has been for quite some time. This is in part what drives the story forward, Sonia’s past. Seeing Jez at her door brings backs thoughts and events either long forgotten or deeply buried (which we then get in flashbacks) and yet in a way these have been there subconsciously and may be why she is so obsessed about the house she lives in, one her father left her after he committed suicide.

Sonia’s obsession with The River House is really the only small insight that anyone, including her husband (who is often away on business, and believes is happily married) and daughter (who has recently moved out), could have that in front of there is someone who has been unhinged and rather unstable for quite some time and has been a silent ticking time bomb waiting to go bonkers. Jez’s arrival, to borrow a rare CD of her husbands, is the switch that even Sonia isn’t aware she has been waiting for. This in many ways makes it, and Sonia, all the more frightening.

The story could actually get too claustrophobic if we were in Sonia’s head all the time, there was a point, where after having got Jez so drunk he is practically unconscious that she puts him to bed and starts to stroke him, that I thought ‘I don’t think I can do this for a whole book’. I was feeling sufficiently creeped out and bordering on too uncomfortable to read on, Hancock was achieving her goal but I think she knew just Sonia would be too much, so in comes the narrative of Helen. Helen is Jez’s aunt and also an old friend of Sonia’s, though they haven’t seen each other much. After having had an affair her marriage is in tatters and she’s turned to drink, she has also become the number one suspect in her own nephew’s disappearance.

Through Helen and Sonia we also see behind the closed doors of the exclusive/middle class suburbs of London and in particular to two marriages that in differing ways aren’t working. Hancock also uses these two women to make the point that we never really know what is going on behind closed doors and what skeletons people might have in their closets. It also shows you how complex the book is at its heart, which is another thing I loved about it; I couldn’t second guess it – though of course I tried only to be proved wrong at every one of my assumptions and possible outcomes. Rather like S. J. Watson’s ‘Before I Go To Sleep’ Penny Hancock also makes the familiar suburban life seem a lot less comfortable and much darker around the edges.

Basically I thought this book was great, but I should mention a slight wobble I had with it. It was only one small thing but it was something I noticed. The speed with which the book starts and the momentum that Hancock keeps going to make you turn the page and read ‘just one more chapter’, I think, should have wound down at the end. Everything unfolds and reaches its peak all too quickly and actually a tiny bit more suspense at the end would have not only worked in dragging the ending out, in that torturous ‘oh goodness how on earth will all this end’ way, but it would have been less confusing. I had to read the penultimate chapter a few times to work out what had happened in the present and in the past because it all seemed to happen too quickly, but the epilogue was brilliant and it is a small criticism.

‘Tideline’ is the sort of thriller that I want to put in the path of anyone who doesn’t deem thrillers as literature. It’s got two incredibly interesting and gripping characters at the heart of it, multiple layers with all its back stories, looks at human behaviour (if in extremes) and its simply a cracking tale. Did I mention it’s a debut novel too? I feel it should be mentioned because it’s an incredibly accomplished one. If you love a good gripping tale with thrills and spills and one of the most morbidly fascinating (scary and disturbing) protagonists then ‘Tideline’ is a book you need to pick up pronto. Much recommended.

9 Comments

Filed under Books of 2012, Penny Hancock, Review, Simon & Schuster

9 responses to “Tideline – Penny Hancock

  1. Thanks for the recommendation, I think I will give it a whirl!

  2. “‘Tideline’ is the sort of thriller that I want to put in the path of anyone who doesn’t deem thrillers as literature.” – Now, you’ve got me interested as I don’t read thrillers. 🙂

    • Thanks Samir. The debate on thrillers not being literature is something that really interests me (and always rears its head around Booker time) because it does seem that people don’t think thrillers can be truly literary. I am not sure why this is, possibly the lack of flowery prose, which the crime novels by authors such as Kate Atkinson and Susan Hill prove wrong, or the fact that people assume the characters are one dimensional , Tess Gerritsen, this novel and Val McDermid all prove that wrong so I wonder why it is? Maybe its something for a blog post actually.

  3. Pingback: Why Does Literature Seem To Snub Genre? | Savidge Reads

  4. Fascinating. I too wonder if there’s anything new under the sun to write about – although perhaps the point, if there’s no new topic or plot, is to write it in a new, interesting, engaging way? But it’s funny you say this at the start of this review, because I’m reading Tana French’s The Likeness, and the plot is one that is absolutely unique and new to ME anyway, and I’m loving it. I wrote a bit about it here; does it remind you of anything? I’d be interested to know.

    • It reminds me of a Tess Gerritsen, ‘Body Double’ actually – which is brilliant. I always ponder if I should try Tana French again, I really disliked the ending of her debut so much so that it put me off reading any of her others. I might contemplate giving her a whirl after seeing your review. Thanks Julia.

      • You know, I read In the Woods and have been trying to recall its details (and its ending) in this reading, and for the life of me I can’t. I think that says something about it! I enjoyed Faithful Place and found In the Woods forgettable; this one decidedly stands out in my mind. All of which of course is not to say you’ll love it! And I haven’t finished it yet! But it’s something special in my mind. 🙂 Love to know what you think, of course, if/when you do. I’ll have to check out Body Double. I’ve never read Gerritsen but you’re not the first to recommend her.

      • Start at the beginning with Gerristen as you then get to know Rizzoli and Isles and their dymanic from the start and as it builds. They are brilliant, you will be hooked be warned. I have to spread reading them sparingly.

        Maybe I should try French’s latest and see how I get on?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s